Poll remained open for several days in February 2010

Note from Graham:

Interesting results here. The bread and butter of the website has always been ring results and detailing in-ring histories of territories. And it's pretty clear here that the majority of the fanbase wants it to stay that way. We expanded greatly into doing audio in 2009, from weekly podcasts to interviews with some of the biggest names in the history of the industry. But, according to this, you guys would much rather listen to what other fans have to say about matches than hearing it from wrestlers themselves. Which makes sense. The average wrestling fan can track down a shoot interview with a 10-second Google search. So why give you guys more of the same? Belive that I will take these results to heart and continue to give you guys more of what you want in the years to come. Thanks for the feedback.

What would you like to see more of at The History of WWE?

Interviews 4% (3 votes)
Reviews 35% (24 votes)
Audio 6% (4 votes)
Reader feedback 3% (2 votes)
Historic venue results 21% (14 votes)
Columns 4% (3 votes)
Territories 26% (18 votes)

68 votes total